The students need to act, and they need feedback. This type of learning allows them to focus their attention and to think about and work through a problem
Recently I have been using a simple interactive learning tool without even realizing . This semester I will be placed at a high school teaching Japanese. My Japanese is shaky after years of neglect so I have been using an online program to quickly refresh my reading, writing, spoken, and comprehension skills with a program called JapanesePod101. Each lesson is presented in a number of different formats: different scripts, different audio, and also video. At the end of each lesson there is a quiz, which gives you immediate feedback allowing you to go back immediatly and review those areas you have not got right. The program also has flashcards to help you remember words.
For this reflection I looked more closely at a biology ILT called Froguts Virtual Dissections. I had access to the the free version which doesn't allow you to do everything that the paid version does but it gave me a good feel for what was possible. As a very brief summary, I could virtually move through the frog learning about each of the different features as I went, and being questioned along the way. I found the experience fun, and a great way to learn, I also got a bit bored, and found it hard to navigate through the prac at times.
To put this in context, I can remember every dissection I have ever done. The first was in high-school and was a mouse. I think this was the coolest thing I had ever done - that was until we dissected a whole sheep when I was at uni. I also had to fill in for a invertebrate zoology class learning all about crustaceans and they dissected a crab. Three dissections over a 15 year period.The point is that it is rare for students to be able to do dissections because of animal ethics (for good reasons). A tool such as froguts removes the need for animal ethics from the class room - sometimes this may mean that a class still gets to be taught, even if the students don't get the full experience including touch and smell
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bufo_marinus_from_Australia.JPG |
In terms of the SAMR model for this reason I think that tools such as Froguts can be both a substitution and an augmentation tool for student learning. Students can drill down into the virtual animal, learning about the skin, the skeletal system, the organs (substitution). They also need to interact, clicking on parts of the animal to demonstrate they have understood, and to progress through the practical. This is an activity they could do prior to a real dissection, as a revision at home, or as a compliment to the practical class (augmentation).
To take this type of learning experience to the modification stage, I suspect that students would need to be able to capture their own observations in an online collaboration, perhaps comparing what they actually saw or experienced in a real dissection with a virtual dissection. Students could also make some real life observations of how frogs move, eat, breed, vocalise, using video and audio files, imbed these in a presentation file and then link this to images from the dissection in order to demonstrate how physiology and anatomy relate. This would be a redefinition of how dissections are carried out.


